{"id":1150,"date":"2021-02-19T08:29:20","date_gmt":"2021-02-19T13:29:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/?p=1150"},"modified":"2021-02-19T08:29:20","modified_gmt":"2021-02-19T13:29:20","slug":"does-vaccine-efficacy-mean-what-i-think-it-means","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/?p=1150","title":{"rendered":"Does vaccine efficacy mean what I think it means?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Question:<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0We keep talking\u00a0about vaccine efficacy.\u00a0 I thought 95% efficacy meant that 95 of 100 people vaccinated would be protected.\u00a0 Is that correct?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Answer:\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>That&#8217;s what a lot of us think vaccine\u00a0efficacy\u00a0means, but alas, it&#8217;s incorrect.\u00a0 Instead of thinking about vaccine efficacy in terms of &#8220;people protected,&#8221;\u00a0we should think about it in terms of &#8220;risk reduction.&#8221;\u00a0 Pfizer had 95% efficacy and Moderna had 94% efficacy in clinical trials.\u00a0 This means that the two vaccines reduced the vaccinated population&#8217;s risk of becoming sick with COVID by 95% and 94% respectively.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two days ago, <em>Lancet<\/em>\u00a0published a short comment on this very topic, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/laninf\/article\/PIIS1473-3099(21)00075-X\/fulltext\">What does 95% COVID-19 vaccine efficacy really mean?<\/a>.\u00a0 As the author describes, if we estimate that the virus has an attack rate of 1% over a 3 month period, a non-vaccinated population would expect to experience 1,000 COVID cases per every 100,000 individuals.\u00a0 If that population were vaccinated with a 95% effective vaccine, we would expect a 95% reduction in the risk of disease; instead of 1,000 cases\/100,000 individuals over 3 months, we would expect 50 cases\/100,000 individuals over 3 months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>A quick note on vaccine efficacy vs. effectiveness:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0 Vaccine efficacy is a measure of how well the vaccine performs in clinical settings.\u00a0 Meanwhile, vaccine effectiveness is a measure of how well the\u00a0vaccine prevents disease in &#8220;real world&#8221; settings, e.g. outside of clinical trials.\u00a0 The data from Israel shared in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/?p=1147\">yesterday&#8217;s Q&amp;A\u00a0<\/a>was vaccine effectiveness; preliminary analytic results show Pfizer&#8217;s vaccine effectiveness (94%) is nearly equivalent to its efficacy (95%).\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Question:\u00a0We keep talking\u00a0about vaccine efficacy.\u00a0 I thought 95% efficacy meant that 95 of 100 people vaccinated would be protected.\u00a0 Is that correct? Answer:\u00a0That&#8217;s what a lot of us think vaccine\u00a0efficacy\u00a0means, but alas, it&#8217;s incorrect.\u00a0 Instead of thinking about vaccine efficacy in terms of &#8220;people protected,&#8221;\u00a0we should think about it in terms of &#8220;risk reduction.&#8221;\u00a0 Pfizer [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1151,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[17,64],"tags":[175,174],"class_list":["post-1150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-risk-reduction","category-vaccines","tag-effectiveness","tag-efficacy","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/covidqanda.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/pexels-photo-4167541.jpeg?fit=867%2C1300&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1150"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1150\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1152,"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1150\/revisions\/1152"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1151"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/covidqanda.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}